
Finance & Banking/Software Development
Platform for Efficient Payment Processing
Payment platform for processing transactions and connecting financial institutions
View projectSolbeg is usually engaged when interface inconsistencies are already visible in support requests, product analytics, or a growing front-end backlog. Teams looking for a UI UX agency at this stage often need to understand why users leave key flows, why design decisions keep reopening, and where inconsistent patterns are slowing development. Solbeg addresses these needs within a broader software engineering environment.
Signup, checkout, onboarding, or a core workflow loses users at a specific point, and the team can see where but not why. Product and marketing may have different explanations without enough evidence to confirm the cause. Interface changes are released, yet the team still cannot clearly explain why conversion moves.
Different screens handle the same task in different ways because each was designed in isolation by whoever had capacity at the time. Users have to relearn patterns as they move through the product. Support ends up answering questions that the interface should make clear on its own.
Without a shared component library, the front-end team implements new variations of buttons, tables, forms, and modals across different screens. The codebase accumulates near-duplicates that become expensive to change. A simple visual update can turn into work across several sprints.
Screens circulate for weeks because there is no agreed basis for deciding which version is right. Decisions may end up being driven by seniority or preference rather than user evidence. The roadmap starts slipping before implementation even begins.
Solbeg’s UI UX design services combine research, interaction design, interface design, prototyping, design systems, and implementation support. UI UX services are scoped around the gaps in the client’s product and delivery process, allowing Solbeg to join at the research, redesign, or implementation stage without forcing a fixed package.
The problem
Fragmented design ownership creates inconsistent product decisions
In teams without dedicated design ownership, interface work can be distributed across several roles. A front-end engineer produces screens between development tasks, a founder sketches flows, or a marketing designer adapts brand assets for the product interface. The work gets done, but consistency across the product becomes difficult to maintain.
Decisions can also be made without enough evidence. If there is no record of why a flow is structured in a particular way, each review can reopen questions that were already discussed. New team members may revisit previous decisions because the reasoning behind them is no longer visible.
Even strong visual design can create implementation gaps if it only shows ideal states. A few finished screens do not tell an engineer what should happen with long text, failed requests, slow connections, empty data, or restricted permissions. Those gaps are then resolved during development, and the released interface can gradually drift away from the approved design.
Solbeg's approach
Design is connected to implementation from the start
Companies looking for a UI UX design agency often need clear ownership of interface decisions across screens and platforms. At Solbeg, this responsibility sits within a broader product engineering process, where design patterns are established and reused across the product.
Design decisions are connected to evidence. Research findings, product data, and usability test results can be documented alongside the flows they support. This gives stakeholders a common basis for review and reduces the need to reopen decisions without new information.
Deliverables are prepared with implementation in mind. Components are specified with their relevant states, responsive behavior, and usage conditions. Our UX UI design services can also include review of implemented screens, so differences between design and production are identified during delivery rather than after release.
Dedicated design work becomes relevant when a product is being built, restructured, adapted to new platforms, or scaled across several engineering teams. Solbeg focuses the engagement on the delivery constraint involved, whether that is missing user flows, inconsistent interface patterns, a design bottleneck, or modernization that must preserve established user behavior.
There is a specification and a development plan, but no defined flows or interface. Engineering needs something concrete to build against before implementation moves too far. Design has to stay ahead of development without becoming a separate project that delays it.
An existing product needs restructuring, but the current audience already knows how it works. The redesign has to account for learned behavior, existing workflows, and the risk of disrupting people who use the product regularly. That makes the work materially different from designing a first version.
Your engineers have capacity, but the backlog is blocked because screens and interaction rules are not defined. Front-end work either waits or has to be reworked later. UX UI services at this stage are about restoring delivery throughput rather than simply refreshing the visual style.
As development is split across squads, each team can begin solving interface challenges locally and in its own way. A shared component library and documented rules become necessary before those differences become expensive to reconcile. At this stage, involving a UX UI design firm helps establish shared patterns before interface inconsistency begins affecting delivery time as well as user experience.
The business logic still works, but the interface may have been designed around older workflows, technology constraints, or users who received extensive training. Employees may rely on workarounds, while onboarding new users takes longer than it should. The task is to improve the interaction without disrupting the operational processes the system supports.
Screen size and touch input affect the structure of a task, not only the layout. Flows designed for a large monitor may need to be reorganized around what users can realistically do on a phone, often in shorter sessions and in different usage contexts.
The exact scope is defined for each engagement. Solbeg’s UI and UX design services can combine research, product UX, interface design, design-system work, prototyping, mobile adaptation, engineering handoff, and design QA according to the product and delivery needs.
UX research
Stakeholder and user interviews, review of available analytics and support tickets, analysis of competing interfaces, and usability testing of existing flows. The output can include a documented list of findings prioritized by their effect on user tasks and product goals.
Product UX design
Information architecture, navigation models, task flows, wireframes, and screen-state definitions, including permissions, empty data, partial data, and failure conditions.
Interface design
Visual design for web and mobile screens, including typography, color and contrast, grid behavior, responsive layouts, iconography, and the interaction states required by individual components.
Design system
A component library with usage rules, design tokens, naming conventions aligned where appropriate with the front-end implementation, and documentation that allows new screens to be composed from established elements.
Prototyping
Clickable prototypes at the level of fidelity required for the decision being made, including flow-level prototypes for internal review and more detailed versions used during usability testing.
Mobile UX/UI design
Design adapted to iOS and Android conventions, screen sizes, interaction patterns, and platform-specific behavior. The approach can also account for whether the application is implemented natively or with a cross-platform framework such as React Native or Flutter.
Design-to-engineering handoff
Specifications, assets, component behavior, and relevant implementation notes prepared for the front-end stack in use, including React, Angular, and Vue projects. Designers can remain available to engineers while implementation is in progress.
Design QA
Review of implemented screens against the agreed design on relevant devices and browsers, covering spacing, states, responsive behavior, and interaction details. As a UX UI design company with engineering capabilities, Solbeg can communicate these findings directly in terms the development team can act on.
Solbeg delivers design inside a software engineering organization, so interface decisions can be evaluated against implementation constraints before they reach development. This keeps UX/UI work aligned with backend, frontend, mobile, and existing system requirements throughout delivery.
Design is checked against implementation reality
Screens can be reviewed against the technical constraints of the product before implementation begins. Decisions that would be unnecessarily expensive, difficult to maintain, or unsuitable for the selected stack can be identified during design instead of after development is already underway.
The same partner can design and build
As a UI UX design company with backend, frontend, and mobile engineering capabilities, Solbeg can take a product from user flows and interface design into web application development without introducing a separate vendor between the two stages. Keeping design and engineering within the same engagement can reduce interpretation gaps and coordination overhead.
Experience with products that already carry constraints
Solbeg works with existing and long-lived software, including systems that businesses rely on for day-to-day operations. Design in this context has to account for existing data structures, workflows, technical constraints, and user habits rather than assuming that everything can be redesigned from a blank slate.
Work with different types of business software
Design work is not limited to consumer-facing applications. Products can include internal systems, administration interfaces, customer portals, dashboards, and other software used by operators and domain specialists. Complex workflows and business rules are treated as design inputs rather than simplified away.
Delivery setup for US-based clients
Solbeg works with clients and delivery teams across multiple locations, including the United States. US-based companies evaluating a UX UI design agency often also need a partner that can coordinate design directly with software engineering. Solbeg already works in this distributed model, reducing the setup required before design and development begin.
Solbeg can structure design work as a complete phase before implementation or keep design one step ahead of engineering throughout delivery. Teams looking for a UX UI agency often face the same delivery choice: complete the design scope first or keep design moving alongside development. The decision affects planning accuracy, time to the first implemented screens, and how easily priorities can change during development.
Solbeg structures a full-cycle engagement around discovery, research, interaction design, interface design, implementation support, and design QA. When only part of the scope is needed, the team can join at the relevant stage without requiring the full design cycle.
Discovery and scope definition
We review the product, current interface, business goals, users, and technical constraints with the relevant product and technical stakeholders. The result is an agreed scope, a list of included flows, and an understanding of the design capacity required.
Research and current-state review
Available usage data, existing flows, support feedback, stakeholder input, and user research are reviewed according to the agreed scope. The findings are turned into a prioritized set of issues that gives later design decisions a documented basis.
Structure and prototype
Information architecture, task flows, and wireframes are developed and, where useful, assembled into a clickable prototype. Structural changes can still be made at this stage before detailed interface work or implementation begins.
Interface design and component system
Screens are designed with the states and responsive behavior they require, while repeated patterns are defined as reusable components. The output includes the agreed screens together with the rules needed to extend the interface consistently.
Handoff and support during implementation
Specifications and relevant assets are provided to the engineering team, while designers remain available for questions within the agreed scope. Keeping design involved during implementation helps resolve interpretation issues before they reach production.
Design QA and iteration
Implemented screens are reviewed against the agreed design, and identified differences are documented for the development team. Where ongoing design is part of the engagement, findings from implementation and real product usage can feed into the next iteration.
Examples of how we help companies turn ideas into reliable digital products that people use every day.

Finance & Banking/Software Development
Payment platform for processing transactions and connecting financial institutions
View project
Android Development/Media & Entertainment
Android video editing application adapted for ChromeOS
View project
Oil & Gas/QA/Software Development/Web Development
Mobile and web platform for vehicle service and ownership management
View projectDevelopers and designers are responsible for different parts of product delivery. Designers define user flows, interaction logic, component behavior, screen states, and interface consistency, while developers turn those decisions into working software. At Solbeg, design and engineering work together throughout delivery, giving developers clearer specifications and reducing rework caused by unresolved UX/UI decisions. Companies often involve a UI UX design firm when these responsibilities need dedicated ownership across the product.
Yes. Existing brand guidelines can be used as an input to product design and extended where the interface requires rules the brand system does not cover, such as data density, table behavior, responsive layouts, accessibility, and component states.
The exact deliverables depend on the agreed scope. They can include designed screens and their states, prototypes, a component library, design tokens, research findings, and specifications that engineers can use during implementation. The reasoning behind important flow and interaction decisions can also be documented so the work remains usable after the engagement ends.
Yes. A redesign can be divided into parts that are designed and released independently instead of being introduced through one large switchover. The sequence depends on the structure of the current interface, shared components, dependencies, and the product roadmap.
Both can be included. The research scope is agreed at the beginning of the engagement and can include stakeholder interviews, user interviews, usability testing, analytics review, and support data. Some projects require new research, while others can start with information the client already has.
Yes. A smaller engagement can begin with a review of the existing interface, research around a specific challenge, or the redesign of one important flow. This creates a concrete result and helps define the scope of a larger redesign before a broader commitment is made.
Yes. A shared design foundation can be established where appropriate and then adapted to the constraints of each platform. A flow that works well on a large screen may need to be reorganized for mobile, while iOS and Android interfaces should also account for their respective platform conventions rather than reproducing the web layout on a smaller screen.
End-to-end services to build, launch, and grow your digital product.