Real Estate/Web Development
Leading Home Renovation Contractor
Web app for calculating bathroom renovation costs
View projectManual QA
Client Challenges
Where Product Quality Becomes Harder To Maintain Without Dedicated Testing
These challenges often appear when a product grows faster than the testing process around it, leaving too little time for systematic regression, edge-case coverage, and validation across the environments customers actually use.
Developers usually confirm that a feature works along the expected path before moving to the next task. Edge cases, invalid inputs, unusual sequences, or combinations outside that path can reach production and appear later in support tickets, app store reviews, or customer feedback.
New code can affect behavior in areas that were not changed directly. Without a maintained regression scope, previously stable functionality may fail after an update, creating hotfixes, unplanned releases, and additional support work.
When defects are reported by product managers, sales teams, or customers, the reports may lack reproduction steps, environment details, expected behavior, or supporting evidence. Engineers then spend additional time trying to recreate the issue before they can investigate its cause.
The product may be checked only on the laptops, phones, browsers, and operating systems readily available to the development team. Layout issues, interaction problems, or failed flows on other supported configurations can therefore remain unnoticed until customers encounter them.
Service Overview
Manual QA That Helps Teams Release With Confidence
Solbeg’s quality assurance services include manual testing that combines structured test cases with hands-on exploration of the product. The exact mix depends on the product stage, release frequency, supported platforms, and the business impact of defects in different areas.
Validation that features behave according to requirements, user stories, acceptance criteria, and agreed business rules, including invalid inputs, permissions, boundary cases, and error states where relevant.
Rechecking existing functionality after new features, fixes, configuration changes, or platform updates to confirm that previously working behavior has not been unintentionally affected.
Exploratory testing Time-boxed testing guided by product knowledge, risk, and observations made during execution rather than only by predefined scripts. This is useful for finding issues in combinations and user behaviors that formal documentation may not describe.
Review of layouts, navigation, interface behavior, content, and user flows from the user’s perspective, together with checks against approved designs where those are part of the requirements.
Testing of web and mobile applications across the agreed set of browsers, operating system versions, devices, screen sizes, and other supported configurations.
Focused checks of critical functionality after a new build, fix, or environment change to determine whether the build is suitable for deeper testing or further release activities.
Problem & solution
The problem
Testing can become inconsistent without a defined process
In many product teams, testing exists as a task inside delivery rather than as a repeatable function. There may be no maintained regression scope, test plan, shared documentation, or agreed criteria for when a build is ready to progress. What gets checked can therefore depend on available capacity and the product knowledge of the people involved.
Testing can also become constrained when features reach QA close to the planned release date. The available test window becomes shorter while the amount of software that needs validation has not changed. Regression coverage may then need to be prioritized according to release risk and available time.
When the same people who designed or implemented a feature are responsible for all of its verification, they naturally know the intended path through the functionality. That context is useful, but it can also make unusual inputs, unexpected sequences, and user behaviors less obvious. Their primary development or product responsibilities also limit how much time they can spend on systematic testing.
Solbeg's approach
A structured testing process run by dedicated QA engineers
Solbeg’s manual software testing services begin by defining the testing scope, priorities, environments, documentation, and release criteria required for the engagement. This makes testing repeatable and reduces dependence on individual memory or last-minute availability.
QA is integrated into the delivery cycle rather than introduced only when development is complete. Engineers can review requirements and acceptance criteria before features reach the test environment, allowing test cases and risk areas to be prepared in advance. Regression coverage is prioritized according to business impact so the most important checks remain visible when timelines are constrained.
With manual QA testing services from Solbeg, testing is performed by specialists whose primary responsibility is product quality. They can combine scripted checks with exploratory testing around edge cases, unusual sequences, integration behavior, and other scenarios that are difficult to cover through predefined happy paths alone.
When this service fits
When Manual QA From An External Team Makes Sense
Companies often start evaluating manual testing companies when a specific release, capacity, product maturity, or acceptance requirement creates more testing work than the current team can cover reliably.
A launch or significant product update may require regression across existing functionality as well as validation of new features. The internal team is often focused on completing development, while an external QA team can run an agreed test scope in parallel with final engineering work.
An internal QA team may cover normal sprint work but need additional capacity during release peaks, seasonal demand, or periods when several products or workstreams ship at once. External QA engineers can take responsibility for defined areas while internal specialists focus on the parts that require the most product-specific knowledge.
Early-stage products and rapidly changing features can make UI automation expensive to maintain because screens, flows, and business rules continue to evolve. Manual testing can provide immediate coverage while the product stabilizes and the team identifies which scenarios are mature enough to automate.
After a platform migration, redesign, modernization, or backend replacement, the new implementation often needs to preserve important existing behavior. Manual testers can compare old and new flows and identify differences that were not part of the intended change.
Automated checks only cover the scenarios and assertions they were designed to execute. Visual issues, confusing flows, unexpected combinations, and behavior outside the automated regression scope can still reach production. Exploratory and usability-oriented manual testing can target these gaps.
Before a release, milestone, or handover is accepted, the product may need structured validation against agreed requirements, acceptance criteria, and supported environments. Solbeg can provide the QA scope and execution needed to support that acceptance process.
Scope of Work
What Solbeg's QA Engineers Do Before, During, And After Testing
Solbeg’s manual QA testing services cover preparation, execution, defect management, and reporting rather than producing only a list of discovered bugs. The exact scope depends on the product, release process, and responsibilities retained by the client’s team.
Requirements and risk review
QA engineers review available specifications, user stories, acceptance criteria, designs, and other relevant materials. Ambiguous or conflicting requirements can be raised before execution, while higher-risk product areas are identified for additional attention.
Test planning
The test plan defines the agreed scope, relevant testing types, environments, responsibilities, dependencies, and other conditions required for the test cycle. It provides a reference point when release dates or priorities change.
Test cases and checklists
Detailed test cases can be maintained for critical or complex flows, while checklists can be used for areas where lighter documentation is more efficient. Documentation evolves as functionality changes so regression coverage remains aligned with the current product.
Environment and test data preparation
QA engineers prepare or request the accounts, roles, permissions, configurations, and data states required by the agreed scenarios and coordinate with the relevant technical teams when environment changes are needed.
Test cycle execution
Scripted scenarios and exploratory sessions are executed on the agreed staging, pre-production, device, browser, or application configurations.
Bug reporting and fix verification
Defects are documented with reproduction steps, environment details, expected and actual behavior, severity or priority information where agreed, and screenshots, recordings, logs, or other evidence where useful. Fixed defects are retested together with relevant surrounding functionality.
Test cycle reporting
The team summarizes executed coverage, open defects, affected areas, known limitations, and any scope that was not completed. This gives product and engineering stakeholders a factual basis for release decisions.
Why Solbeg
What Product Teams Get From Solbeg's Manual QA Engineers
When comparing manual software testing companies, it is useful to look beyond the number of testers and consider how QA work will integrate with development, requirements, defect management, and release decisions.
Testing is backed by software engineering experience
For teams evaluating a manual testing company, Solbeg brings manual QA into a broader software engineering context. QA engineers understand the technical context in which defects are investigated and fixed, helping reports contain the information engineering teams need to act.
Product knowledge can be retained across releases
QA engineers who remain involved with a product develop knowledge of its business rules, integrations, high-risk areas, and historical defects. Regression planning can build on that context rather than rebuilding the same product knowledge for every release.
Testing can be planned together with development and modernization
Solbeg also develops web, mobile, and enterprise software and works on modernization projects. When QA and engineering are part of the same engagement, testing can be planned against the same requirements, architecture changes, and release sequence.
Cross-platform testing can be covered within one QA scope
Solbeg’s QA engineers can test web and mobile products across the agreed browsers, operating systems, devices, and screen configurations. This allows compatibility and user-flow validation to remain within one QA scope even when the product spans several platforms and client applications.
Industry context can inform test design
Understanding the business process behind a feature helps QA engineers test domain-specific rules, edge cases, permissions, calculations, and user expectations rather than limiting coverage to generic interface behavior.
Comparison
Manual And Automated Testing Address Different Quality Needs
Teams considering manual testing services often ask whether automation would be a better investment. In practice, the two approaches usually complement each other. The balance depends on product stability, release frequency, regression size, supported platforms, and the types of defects the team needs to detect.
Engagement Process
Manual QA Delivery Across Scope, Test Cycles, And Release Assessment
A manual QA engagement can be structured in stages, with each stage producing an agreed output before the next part begins. This keeps testing scope, responsibilities, and release priorities visible throughout the work.
-
Product and scope review
Solbeg QA engineers review the product, available requirements, current testing practices, supported environments, and release plans with the relevant product and technical stakeholders. The result is an agreed test scope and a set of priority areas.
-
Test design
QA engineers prepare the test plan, test cases, checklists, risk areas, and other documentation required for the agreed scope. The client’s team reviews important assumptions and coverage before execution begins.
-
Access and environment setup
Required builds, environments, defect-tracking systems, accounts, permissions, and test data are prepared. QA verifies that the necessary conditions are available before the first planned test cycle starts.
-
Test cycles and defect handling
QA engineers execute the agreed scenarios, perform exploratory testing, report defects, and verify fixes delivered by the development team. Open issues and priorities are reviewed at the cadence agreed for the engagement.
-
Regression and release assessment
Before release, the agreed regression scope is executed and the team provides a summary of completed coverage, unresolved defects, known risks, and any testing limitations. The final release decision remains with the client’s responsible product or delivery stakeholders.
Completed projects
View all projectsSome of our recent work
Real products our team has designed, developed, and launched together with clients, from idea to release.
Finance & Banking/Software Development
Platform for Efficient Payment Processing
Payment platform for processing transactions and connecting financial institutions
View project
Finance & Banking/Software Development
DocEx Secure Document Distribution
SaaS platform for secure distribution of confidential documents
View projectFAQ
Questions Teams Ask Before Engaging Manual QA
Not always. Most manual testing can be performed against a running application or build using access to the relevant test environment, accounts, and available requirements. Repository or log access may still be useful for particular types of investigation, but it is not automatically required for every manual QA engagement.
Yes. Missing test cases do not necessarily prevent testing from starting. QA engineers can begin with product exploration, available requirements, designs, release notes, and discussions with product stakeholders, then document critical flows and regression coverage as the engagement progresses.
The browser, operating system, device, and screen-size matrix is agreed according to the product’s supported platforms and user base. Usage analytics, customer requirements, market share, and known support obligations can all inform the final coverage.
Some collaboration is required for requirement clarification, environment support, defect triage, and fix verification. The amount depends on documentation quality, product complexity, release frequency, and how responsibilities are divided between the teams. A clear technical or product contact on the client’s side helps keep that involvement predictable.
Confidentiality, access, and data-handling requirements are agreed before testing begins. Where required, Solbeg can work under an NDA, while the client controls access to environments, accounts, and project systems. Test data can be used instead of production information where appropriate, and permissions can be limited to the scope testers need.
Related Services
You may also need
End-to-end services to build, launch, and grow your digital product.