Real Estate/Web Development
Leading Home Renovation Contractor
Web app for calculating bathroom renovation costs
View projectDevOps
Client Challenges
Delivery Challenges Companies Face Before Infrastructure Work Begins
Solbeg is usually brought in for DevOps services when releases have become slow, unpredictable, or dependent on a small number of people, and the impact on the product roadmap is already visible.
Deploying to production requires a sequence of steps performed manually, often outside working hours. Only a few engineers know these steps, and they are not documented clearly enough for others to follow them reliably. A release becomes an event that has to be scheduled rather than a routine action.
Code that passes testing in development or staging behaves differently once it goes live. Teams spend hours reproducing failures caused by configuration differences between environments. Confidence in testing drops, and more defects reach users.
The engineer who built the servers, pipeline, or deployment scripts is the only person who fully understands them. Vacation, sick leave, or resignation can become a delivery risk for the entire product. Changes get postponed because nobody else is comfortable modifying the configuration.
The monthly infrastructure bill increases while traffic and user numbers remain flat. Spending cannot be attributed to specific services, environments, or teams without manual investigation. Finance asks questions that engineering is not set up to answer quickly.
Service Overview
DevOps Engineering Across Delivery Pipelines, Infrastructure, And Production Operations
Our DevOps solutions cover the delivery path from a developer branch to a running production system, as well as the infrastructure that path depends on. Solbeg scopes each engagement around the delivery constraints already affecting the product and combines the engineering areas required to address them.
A review of the current release process, environments, and infrastructure before any changes are proposed. DevOps consulting services can also be used on their own when a company needs an independent technical assessment before committing budget to implementation.
Building or reworking CI/CD pipelines so that build, test, and deployment run as one automated sequence. This includes branching and release strategy, artifact handling, and deployment gates.
Infrastructure is defined in version-controlled configuration instead of through manual console changes. Environments can be recreated, reviewed, and modified through the same controlled process used for application code.
Packaging applications into containers and running them with defined scaling rules, resource limits, and health checks. This covers how workloads are deployed, updated, scaled, and rolled back.
Setting up metrics, log collection, and alerting rules so that failures are detected by the system rather than first reported by a customer. This includes dashboards and alert routing for the engineers responsible for responding.
Secrets management, separation of access between environments, and automated checks within the build process. Production access can be controlled by role and logged according to the agreed security model.
Problem & solution
The problem
Infrastructure work competes with feature work, and feature work usually wins
Pipeline and infrastructure improvements are rarely the most urgent items in a product backlog. They get scheduled after the current release, then after the next one. The work that could make every future release faster and more predictable keeps losing to the releases themselves.
The work is also often distributed among people who own it only as part of their role. A backend engineer sets up a pipeline, a team lead configures the cloud account, and someone adds monitoring during an incident but never returns to improve it. The result is a delivery setup with no consistent design behind it and no single owner accountable for its overall condition.
Infrastructure decisions are long-lived and expensive to reverse. Environment structure, network layout, and deployment models can constrain what the product is able to do for years. Teams making these decisions for the first time often discover their limitations during a growth phase or an outage, which can make redesign considerably more disruptive.
Solbeg's approach
Delivery infrastructure handled as a defined scope of engineering work
We take the delivery and infrastructure scope out of the product backlog and run it as a separate stream of work with its own plan and review points. DevOps consulting starts with a review of the current pipeline, environments, and deployment path, so the sequence of changes reflects what is actually slowing delivery down rather than following a standard checklist.
Ownership is explicit. The engineers assigned to the engagement are responsible for the pipeline, environments, and automation as a whole. Infrastructure and pipeline configuration is version-controlled and documented where appropriate, so critical knowledge does not remain in one person’s memory. DevOps implementation services are delivered in stages, with the existing release process remaining operational until the new one has been tested in day-to-day use and can reliably replace it.
Architectural decisions are made with their operational implications clearly defined: how environments will be recreated, how the system will scale, how failures will be detected, and what a rollback will look like in practice. When a delivery constraint involves the application rather than infrastructure alone, Solbeg can extend the same engagement into application engineering because devops services and solutions are supported by software development and QA capabilities within the same organization.
When this service fits
When External DevOps Engineering Support Becomes Practical
External DevOps support becomes valuable when delivery infrastructure starts affecting migration plans, product growth, compliance requirements, or production reliability and the internal team cannot address that work without taking capacity away from the roadmap.
Migration changes where the system runs, how environments are created, and how deployments happen. If the migration also requires changes to the application, cloud development services can support that work alongside the infrastructure changes. If the pipeline remains unchanged, the new environment can end up being operated with the same manual processes used before the migration. The delivery process is redesigned as part of the move rather than treated as a follow-up project.
Early in the product lifecycle, the environment structure, deployment model, and pipeline can be established before there is a live production system to protect. Doing the same work later means changing a system that already has users and an established release schedule. It also gives every new engineer a defined way to ship changes from the beginning.
The system is running, but the infrastructure behind it may be undocumented and access may be incomplete. Before new development can proceed safely, environments, deployment paths, dependencies, and access need to be mapped and brought under control. This is as much a discovery task as an engineering one.
Enterprise buyers and security teams may ask who can deploy, how changes are approved, and how production access is restricted. Answering these questions credibly requires the relevant controls to exist within the delivery process, not only in a policy document.
With several teams delivering into the same environments, releases start to queue and unrelated changes get bundled together. When something breaks, the cause becomes harder to isolate because multiple changes were released at once. The delivery process needs to support parallel work rather than simply being extended.
The volume of DevOps work can be substantial but uneven: high during initial setup or migration and lower between those periods. A full-time role can be difficult to justify for that workload, while relying on a single specialist can recreate the same concentration of knowledge. DevOps outsourcing services can cover periods of higher demand while maintaining continuity between them.
Failures are discovered when a customer reports them, and recovery depends on who happens to be available. Improving this requires monitoring that shows what is happening and a deployment process that allows fixes to be released quickly and safely. Both are infrastructure concerns rather than incident management alone.
Scope of Work
CI/CD And Deployment Engineering
A Solbeg DevOps engagement can cover delivery pipelines, infrastructure architecture, observability, access controls, test integration, and application changes required for reliable deployment. As a DevOps services company with backend, frontend, and QA engineering in-house, we can extend the scope into application work when a delivery constraint originates in the code.
Delivery and infrastructure audit
Review of the current pipeline, environments, deployment path, access model, and monitoring coverage. The output is a documented description of the current state, with findings ranked by their impact on delivery and the risk of leaving them unresolved.
DevOps engineers
Building and maintaining CI/CD pipelines, deployment automation, and environment provisioning. The responsibility covers the full path from commit to a running service, including build reproducibility and rollback procedures.
Infrastructure architecture
Design of environment topology, network and access layout, scaling models, backup, and recovery procedures. Decisions are documented together with the trade-offs behind them, so they can be reviewed later instead of reverse-engineered.
Infrastructure as code
Infrastructure is described in version-controlled configuration and changed through the same review process used for application code. This reduces configuration drift between environments and makes rebuilding infrastructure a repeatable operation.
Monitoring and observability
Metrics, log collection, alerting rules, and dashboards for the services that matter to the business. Alerts are tied to conditions that require human action, helping the on-call engineer focus on meaningful events.
Pipeline and access security
Secrets management, separation of access between environments, and automated checks within the build process. Production access is granted by role and logged rather than shared.
Test automation inside the pipeline
Integration of automated tests into the build and deployment sequence, with defined quality gates and disposable environments for test runs. Our DevOps development services connect directly with QA capabilities, so quality gates can be defined together with the specialists responsible for the tests.
Changes required to make software deployable
Work on configuration handling, health checks, startup behavior, and application logging. A DevOps company that cannot change application code reaches a practical limit here, so this work can be handled by backend engineers alongside the DevOps team.
Why Solbeg
How Solbeg Delivers DevOps Work In Practice
Solbeg combines DevOps, software engineering, and QA within one delivery organization. This allows infrastructure work to stay connected to application changes, testing, and production requirements throughout the engagement.
DevOps work stays connected to application engineering
A significant share of delivery problems cannot be solved at the infrastructure level alone. Because software engineering, QA, and infrastructure capabilities sit within one organization, the work can cross that boundary without requiring another vendor or a separate contract. Working with a DevOps development company that also builds applications shortens the path between diagnosis and implementation.
Assessment before implementation, as a separate deliverable
Work starts with a review of your existing delivery setup rather than with a predefined toolchain. You receive a documented view of what is slowing delivery down and what each proposed change would involve before committing to the implementation scope. As a DevOps consulting company, we treat the assessment as a useful deliverable in its own right, including when no implementation follows.
Configuration that does not depend on specific individuals
Pipelines, infrastructure definitions, and runbooks are version-controlled and documented as part of delivery rather than afterwards. This allows your team to operate and modify them without depending on the engineers who originally built them. It also makes a future handover a practical option rather than simply a clause in a contract.
Scope that can expand and contract
An engagement can start with a narrow scope, such as an audit or a single pipeline rebuild, and grow into ongoing engineering, or move in the opposite direction. A DevOps solutions company with access to a broader engineering team can add specialists when workload increases during a migration or platform project and scale the team back down afterwards.
Work on systems that are already in production
Many engagements begin with systems that already have live users, where a delivery freeze is not a practical option. Changes to pipelines and environments are introduced in stages, with the current process remaining available until the new one has been proven in regular use.
Comparison
Two Engagement Formats For DevOps Work And What Each One Assumes
DevOps work can be delivered as a defined implementation project with handover or as an ongoing engineering function. The choice depends on who will operate the resulting infrastructure and how frequently the product is expected to require platform changes.
Engagement Process
How A DevOps Engagement Moves From Assessment To A Running System
Whether Solbeg hands the environment over after implementation or stays involved as an ongoing engineering partner, the work moves through controlled stages with review points before responsibility or tooling changes.
-
Discovery and assessment
We review the current pipeline, environments, deployment path, monitoring, and access model together with your engineers and the people currently responsible for releases. The result is a documented view of the current state and a list of findings ranked by delivery impact and risk.
-
Plan and priorities
Findings are turned into a sequence of changes, each with its expected effect and dependencies. Your technical decision-makers confirm what is in scope, in what order the work will be performed, and what is deliberately excluded. The output is an implementation plan against which progress can later be measured.
-
Implementation in increments
with those that reduce risk or remove delivery bottlenecks. Engineers on both sides review infrastructure changes in the same controlled way they review application code. DevOps implementation services are delivered as reviewable increments rather than through a single large-scale switchover.
-
Rollout to the development team
Developers begin using the new pipeline and environments in day-to-day work while the previous path remains available where appropriate. Issues identified during this period are corrected before the old process is retired, reducing the risk of relying on untested assumptions.
-
Documentation and handover, or continued operation
Configuration, runbooks, and the access model are documented and reviewed with your team. From this point, the engagement either closes with a transfer of responsibility or continues as ongoing DevOps engineering, according to the format agreed at the start.
Collaboration model
How DevOps Engineers Integrate With Your Organization And Its Access Rules
DevOps work requires access to repositories, cloud accounts, deployment systems, and sometimes production environments. Solbeg agrees ownership, access rules, communication, and operational responsibilities before engineering work begins so both teams have a clear working boundary. DevOps outsourcing can then fit into the client’s existing engineering and security processes.
Completed projects
View all projectsProjects we’re proud of
Examples of how we help companies turn ideas into reliable digital products that people use every day.
Facility & Asset Management/Hospitality/Software Development/Support
ServiceChannel Facility Management Platform
Cloud platform for automating facility maintenance and work orders
View project
Automotive/Mobile Development/Web Development
Mobile and Web Platform for Automotive Management
Mobile and web platform for vehicle service and ownership management
View projectFAQ
Questions Companies Ask Before Starting DevOps Work
Not necessarily. An existing pipeline can often be improved rather than replaced. A working process already contains operational knowledge that would have to be recreated in a completely new setup. Replacement is usually considered when the existing architecture cannot reasonably support the deployment model or delivery requirements you need. The assessment determines which approach is appropriate.
Yes. Undocumented or partially documented infrastructure can be the starting point for an engagement. Mapping the existing setup becomes part of the assessment. This phase may take longer than it would with well-documented infrastructure, and findings discovered during it can affect the implementation plan.
The goal is to make the delivery process more consistent without unnecessarily disrupting how your development team works. Some changes may be introduced around branching, code reviews, deployments, or environment management where they improve the delivery process. These changes are agreed with your team and introduced as part of the implementation and rollout process.
Both formats can be supported. A DevOps consulting engagement can stop after an assessment and plan, extend into an implementation project with handover, or continue as ongoing engineering depending on the agreed engagement model.
Access follows the security process agreed for the engagement and is limited to the level required for each responsibility.
Handover can be planned from the beginning rather than treated as an unexpected exit. Infrastructure definitions, pipeline configuration, runbooks, and other relevant documentation are maintained in the agreed project systems throughout the engagement. Handover then becomes a transfer of knowledge, access, and responsibility rather than a rebuild.
Yes. Application engineering and QA capabilities can be combined with infrastructure work, so changes that require application-code updates can be handled within the same overall engagement rather than requiring a separate supplier.
Related Services
You may also need
End-to-end services to build, launch, and grow your digital product.